Negative and positive changes, by Haripada dasa
This message is related to the changes that have been made to the books of Srila Prabhupada, these changes are negative and positive, this requires an explanation, an example of negative changes is for example the verse 4, 34 of the Gita, in the original says that the self-realized soul can impart knowledge because you have seen the truth, that is, the guru puts it in the singular, but they changed it and put the self-realized souls can impart knowledge because they have seen the truth, these changes have not made them to satisfy Srila Prabhupada but to satisfy the personal interests of the many iskcon gurus, or in other words, disparaged Srila Prabhupada to favor others, and that is a mistake and a great offense against Srila Prabhupada, in the negative changes there is always malice against Srila Prabhupada, and now I expose the positive changes, for example in the meaning of the Gita, 10, 29 it is said that there is also a planet of trees where pre side Aryama, we all understand that there is no tree planet, as I understand it the devotee who was listening to Srila Prabhupada's tape and writing the Gita understood it that way, but if you look at the verse word by word it says that pitrinam means of the ancestors or ancestors, so in the meaning it should put that there is also a planet of ancestors or ancestors where Aryama presides, another example of positive changes, in the CC, AL, 6, 73 Srila Prabhupada says in the meaning that this verse was spoken by Queen Kunti, but in reality that verse was spoken by Rukmini, positive changes means that we are helping Sria Prabhupada in his service of writing his books, and unlike the negative changes that are based on malice against Srila Prabhupada, the positive changes are based on love for Srila Prabhupada. I would like to know your opinion about all this.
This message is related to the changes that have been made to the books of Srila Prabhupada, these changes are negative and positive, this requires an explanation, an example of negative changes is for example the verse 4, 34 of the Gita, in the original says that the self-realized soul can impart knowledge because you have seen the truth, that is, the guru puts it in the singular, but they changed it and put the self-realized souls can impart knowledge because they have seen the truth, these changes have not made them to satisfy Srila Prabhupada but to satisfy the personal interests of the many iskcon gurus, or in other words, disparaged Srila Prabhupada to favor others, and that is a mistake and a great offense against Srila Prabhupada, in the negative changes there is always malice against Srila Prabhupada, and now I expose the positive changes, for example in the meaning of the Gita, 10, 29 it is said that there is also a planet of trees where pre side Aryama, we all understand that there is no tree planet, as I understand it the devotee who was listening to Srila Prabhupada's tape and writing the Gita understood it that way, but if you look at the verse word by word it says that pitrinam means of the ancestors or ancestors, so in the meaning it should put that there is also a planet of ancestors or ancestors where Aryama presides, another example of positive changes, in the CC, AL, 6, 73 Srila Prabhupada says in the meaning that this verse was spoken by Queen Kunti, but in reality that verse was spoken by Rukmini, positive changes means that we are helping Sria Prabhupada in his service of writing his books, and unlike the negative changes that are based on malice against Srila Prabhupada, the positive changes are based on love for Srila Prabhupada. I would like to know your opinion about all this.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario